28 Days Later Writer Alex Garland Says the Film Is Definitely a ‘Zombie Movie’

Do not tell Alex Garland that 28 Days Later isn’t a zombie movie. Released in 2002, 28 Days Later was written by Garland and directed by Danny Boyle. The film picks up with a man awakening from a coma nearly a month after a viral outbreak has decimated London, leaving most of its inhabitants dead. Those who get infected with the highly-contagious virus do not die and come back from the dead, though they exhibit zombie-like behavior in the sense that they become highly aggressive and spread the disease through biting.

By and large, 28 Days Later is considered to be a “zombie movie,” but some horror fans have argued against this. The feeling some have is that it can not be a zombie movie if the infected are not actually undead, making it more of a contagion film. In any case, the story was crafted by its writer as a zombie movie, even if the rules of the 28 Days Later plague aren’t quite the same as we’ve seen in The Walking Dead and other zombie fiction. As Garland tells Empire:


“I’m aware for years and years there’s been debates about that. Over whether or not it’s a zombie movie. It’s a zombie movie. Whatever technical discrepancies may or may not exist, they’re pretty much zombies.”

More recently, Garland wrote and directed the new horror film Men. On the topic of subgenres, Garland has also clarified that Men isn’t really a sci-fi film, choosing to make that distinction as he’s blended sci-fi and horror in the past. With MenGarland feels that it should be considered a folk horror film in the same vein that 28 Days Later is a zombie horror movie.

“Yeah, it’s not sci-fi. If we’re gonna get into subgenres, the subgenre here is folk horror. It’s the horror of rural England. It’s certain kinds of churches, certain kinds of forest – the shadows within dark green. That kind of thing. “

Men follows a young woman (Jessie Buckley) who heads to the English countryside to cope with the death of her husband (Paapa Essiedu), but for some reason, everyone she meets in the village she visits all seem to look like the same person (Rory Freeman). The movie is set to be released on May 20 in the US followed by a UK release on the first of June.

Related: Cillian Murphy Would Return for Another 28 Days Later Sequel

Will 28 Months Later Ever Be Made?

28 Days Later
Fox Searchlight Pictures

28 Days Later was followed by a sequel, 28 Weeks Laterwhich was released in 2007. There have been rumors for years of a third installment coming along to turn this into a trilogy, perhaps with the title 28 Months Later or even 28 Years Later. 28 Days Later star Cillian Murphy has said he’d be up to return in another movie, and 28 Weeks Later star Imogen previously told us in an exclusive interview that she hopes to see a third film as well.

“Oh, it’s such an interesting idea to think about. It’s weird. I think about that movie like a first love because it was really the first foray I had into acting and obviously was lucky enough to be with Rose Byrne and Jeremy Renner. All of these incredible actors. But yeah, absolutely. I mean, the team behind that. Alex Garland and Danny Boyle. Everyone’s really … Well, Danny Boyle was already Danny Boyle, but everyone has gone on to do such amazing things. I want that director Juan Carlos Fresnadillodo to do some more work. He’s so exceptional. But yeah, I love that film. “

Time will tell if a third film ever happens.


Kaley Cuoco Was ‘Devastated’ Over Losing Knives Out 2 Role to Kate Hudson

Read Next

About The Author

Source link

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published.